[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [egov-registry] eGov regrep
Paul Spencer wrote: >I this would provide a useful comparison. Let's do it. > > OK I will work on the direct RIM mapping and hope to have something to share later this week or next. Carl and Duane you guys are on - let the games begin. Of course I think I got the easier task than you but then again you are two and I am one ;-) -- Regards, Farrukh >Regards > >Paul > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Carl Mattocks [mailto:carlmattocks@checkmi.com] >>Sent: 11 June 2004 17:56 >>To: Egov-Registry >>Subject: Re: [egov-registry] eGov regrep >> >> >>Paul et al : >>Given that - >>(1) the CCTS Registry specification is still embryonic >>(2) use of a mapping to CCTS and then using CCRIM - can only be a >>recommendation >> >>I propose we [show how to] map all the selected e-GMS metdata subset - >>(a) directly to ebRIM (farrukh) >>(b) to CCTS (carl supported by Duane) >> >>comments ??? >> >>carl >> >> >><quote who="Farrukh Najmi"> >> >> >>>Paul Spencer wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Maewyn, >>>> >>>>One thing we need to do for the registry pilot is to look at how to map >>>>the >>>>metadata that will be stored in the registry. I have looked at what I >>>>think >>>>we need to support, both in the proof of concept and the longer >>>> >>>> >>term. The >> >> >>>>attached describes this just for the e-GMS metadata set. Farrukh will >>>>then >>>>look at mapping this to the Registry Information Model. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>Hi Paul, >>> >>>As I understand it the document you posted identifies the subset of >>>e-GMS data for us to focus on within the POC. >>>Thanks for getting this step done. The mapping step requires us to >>>decide between: >>> >>>a) mapping directly to ebRIM (probably ClassificationScheme) or >>> >>>b) mapping to CCTS and then using CCRIM to map to ebRIM >>> >>>As I understand based upon our email discussion, Carl is in favor of >>>(b), you maybe in favor of (a), I am unsure yet but leaning towards (b) >>>and we are waiting on Duane to weigh in on the mapping decision. >>> >>>If we do (a) then I volunteer to map to ebRIM >>>If we do (b) then I believe Carl has volunteered to do mapping to CCTS. >>> >>>Can we get closure on the choice between mapping approach (a) and (b) in >>>this thread? >>> >>>I can provie a sample direct ebRIM mapping for one term (say Audience) >>>by tomorrow if it helps people decide between (a) and (b). Carl could >>>you do same for mapping Audience to CCTS? Does this tactical step make >>>sense? >>> >>>Thanks. >>> >>>-- >>>Regards, >>>Farrukh >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>-- >>Carl Mattocks >> >>co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC >>co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC >>CEO CHECKMi >>v/f (usa) 908 322 8715 >>www.CHECKMi.com >>Semantically Smart Compendiums >>(AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi >> >> > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]