egov message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: FW: NOTICE: message to egov@lists.oasis-open.org rejected
- From: "Zimek, Sinisa" <sinisa.zimek@sap.com>
- To: "'john.borras@e-envoy.gsi.gov.uk'" <john.borras@e-envoy.gsi.gov.uk>, echristian@usgs.gov
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 15:54:36 +0100
John,
sure,
please let me know when the sub-committee will start their
work.
Best
regards,
Sinisa Zimek
Director Technology Architecture &
Standards
SAP Labs,
Inc.
3475 Deer Creek Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
T (650) 849-2647
F (561) 258-8588
E sinisa.zimek@sap.com
www.saplabs.com
Sinisa
First, you are
recorded now as a member so you should be able to post to the mailing
list.
Second, we are about to
establish an Infrastructure sub-committee which Eliot Christian will be leading
and Workflow standards will fall under that remit. So I'm copying him into
this to note your comments and consider BPML. When we set up the new SC
you make care to join it to contribute to the discussions.
Regards,
John
| "Zimek, Sinisa"
<sinisa.zimek@sap.com>
11/03/2003 00:45
| To:
"'john.borras@e-envoy.gsi.gov.uk'"
<john.borras@e-envoy.gsi.gov.uk> cc:
Subject:
FW: NOTICE: message to
egov@lists.oasis-open.org rejected |
Hi John,
would you please forward the attached
email to the e-gov list. Since I'm not a member, the mail was
returned.
Thanks,
> Sinisa Zimek
> Director Technology
Architecture & Standards
> SAP Labs, Inc.
>
> 3475 Deer
Creek Road
> Palo Alto, CA 94304
> T (650) 849-2647
> F (561)
258-8588
> E sinisa.zimek@sap.com
>
www.saplabs.com
-----Original Message-----
From:
egov-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[mailto:egov-help@lists.oasis-open.org]
Sent:
DMon, Mar 10, 2003 16:43 PM
To: Zimek, Sinisa
Subject: NOTICE: message to
egov@lists.oasis-open.org rejected
You:
sinisa.zimek@sap.com
sent a message to the elist:
egov@lists.oasis-open.org
Your message is being returned to you
because that elist only accepts
messages from subscribers and your email
address is not currently
included on the list of subscribers. Your
message has been included
below as an attachment.
You may request a
subscription using the subscription manager:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/subscribe
If you have any questions or
problems you may reply to this message or
send a message to:
egov-help@lists.oasis-open.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eList
eXpress LLC -- An Email
and Elist Service Provider
http://www.elistx.com
-- The Cure For What (M)ails You!
PLEASE
NOTE: THE ABOVE MESSAGE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE INTERNET.
On entering the
GSI, this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet (GSI)
virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable & Wireless in
partnership with MessageLabs.
GSI users see
http://www.gsi.gov.uk/main/new2002notices.htm for further details. In case of
problems, please call your organisational IT helpdesk.
----- Message from "Zimek, Sinisa"
<sinisa.zimek@sap.com> on Tue, 11 Mar 2003 01:42:01 +0100 -----
To:
| "'Michael.Roytman@vertexinc.com'"
<Michael.Roytman@vertexinc.com>, tax@lists.oasis-open.org
|
cc:
| "'egov@lists.oasis-open.org'"
<egov@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Subject:
| RE: [tax] [egov] OASIS E-GOV TC -
DELIVERABLES |
I
was just looking at the attached e-Government standards matrix and wanted to
recommend to consider BPMI.org as a standard body for workflow and process
integration.
BPMI.org is an industry forum which has developed and is
holding one of the most mature specifications in the business process space,
called BPML. You can find futher information on BPMI.org as well as their work
at www.bpmi.org.
If you need furhter information or have any questions,
please let me know.
Best regards,
Sinisa Zimek
> Sinisa
Zimek
> Director Technology Architecture & Standards
> SAP Labs,
Inc.
>
> 3475 Deer Creek Road
> Palo Alto, CA 94304
> T
(650) 849-2647
> F (561) 258-8588
> E sinisa.zimek@sap.com
>
www.saplabs.com
-----Original Message-----
From:
Michael.Roytman@vertexinc.com
[mailto:Michael.Roytman@vertexinc.com]
Sent:
DMon, Mar 10, 2003 5:54 AM
To: tax@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [tax]
[egov] OASIS E-GOV TC - DELIVERABLES
Tax XML TC,
I thought you
might be interested that we've been listed in the
e-Government standards
matrix as an entity responsible for the Tax aspects.
I believe this puts us
on the critical path for the success of e-Government
TC. We will need to
establish a formal liaison with e-Government TC even
though we have
individuals participating in both Tax and e-Government
TCs.
Thanks,
Michael.
----- Forwarded by Michael
Roytman/Construction/Vertexinc on 03/10/2003
08:50 AM
-----
|---------+------------------------------>
|
| john.borras@e-envoy|
|
| .gsi.gov.uk
|
| |
|
| |
03/08/2003 06:36 AM|
| |
|
|---------+------------------------------>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
|
To: Diane.Lewis@usdoj.gov
|
|
cc: egov@lists.oasis-open.org
|
|
Subject: [egov] OASIS E-GOV TC - DELIVERABLES
|
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Diane
Thanks
for an interesting discussion yesterday. It set me thinking about
what is the ultimate output from the TC,
hence I'm copying in the whole
membership on this note.
We talked a
lot about the need for matrices of services and standards, and
I believe that
is ultimately what we should as a TC be aiming to produce
and publish - a set
of matrices for Services/Functions, Infrastructures etc
that show for each
particular aspect of e-government our recommended
standards. This would
be invaluable to governments, particularly those
that are new to the
e-government work, and those communities of governments
like us in the EU who
are looking to join up on service delivery. Clearly
we cannot mandate
these standards but it would send clear messages to
governments around the
world, and their IT suppliers, which are the
standards they should give
serious consideration to.
On that basis I've sketched out a matrix for
your Services focus along the
lines of what we discussed yesterday, and one
for what I'm calling
Infrastructures. This is a first cut and we can
develop it and add to it
as we go. I will be suggesting to the TC on
Wednesday that we need another
Sub-committee to address the infrastructure
issues. The role of both
these SCs would in effect be to
populate these matrices, and that of course
will require looking at what's
the current standard if any , whose doing
what, where are the gaps that need
new work and instigating that work, etc
as we discussed yesterday.
I
see the role of the Best Practices SC to then produce case studies on as
many
of these aspects as possible and they can be cross-referenced in
the
matrices. The ebXML/Web Services SC would feed into many aspects of
the
matrices both as solutions to services and also aspects of
infrastructure.
As I said I'll add this to the agenda for the TC meeting
on Wednesday as I
think it would help us all if we had an agreed vision of
the end point of
our work. Views in the interim from all would be
welcomed.
Apologies that this is only in Word format but I haven't got
Open Office on
my laptop.
Regards,
John
(See attached file:
e-gov TC Matrix.doc)
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]