[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [egov] BCM and eprXML pilots
David RR Webber wrote: >John, > >It's ticklish! I'd like to see more user interface components built >in-front of the Registry. > >I agree that general users should not directly interface to the registry. > >So the notion of a portal - such as the eprXML model - having access to >registry content to drive enduser selections and actions - makes sense. > >An XForms API for Registry might not be a bad "extra" here - so people >could rapidly build forms extensions to registry that conform to the RIM. >Just a thought! > > As an FYI, the ebxmlrr project [1] is currently has a fat Java /Swing UI client for version 2.1 and is working on a state-of-the-art XForms based UI for version 3. We are finding XForms + ebReg to be a very good combination. The UI we are building will also support user defined UI for user defined content. The form's XForm UI, the forms XML Schema and the forms actual XML instance data all reside in the registry. Add to this the fact that form data when submitted can trigger event notification and delivery of events to web services and we have a powerful yet simple workflow capability. All of this is very much intended for the end user (e.g. citizen) and for the run time. -- Farrukh [1] http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net >DW. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Weiland, John R. NMIMC GS" <JRWeiland@US.MED.NAVY.MIL> >To: "'Farrukh Najmi'" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>; "Hans A. Aanesen" ><hans@iti.as> >Cc: <bcm@lists.oasis-open.org>; <egov@lists.oasis-open.org>; "Knut >Lindelien" <Knut.Lindelien@nts.no> >Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:28 AM >Subject: RE: [egov] BCM and eprXML pilots > > > > >>Good Morning, >> >>This seemed to be a recurring theme during our F2F last week. I >> >> >envisioned > > >>a Registry/Repository a utility for programmer's use, not a broker for end >>users. >> >>r/ John Weiland >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] >>Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:53 AM >>To: Hans A. Aanesen >>Cc: bcm@lists.oasis-open.org; egov@lists.oasis-open.org; Knut Lindelien >>Subject: Re: [egov] BCM and eprXML pilots >> >> >>Hans A. Aanesen wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hi >>> >>> >>> >>>Thank you for a very fruitful conference.(Specially our workshop) >>> >>>It is obvious that eprXML will be a very nice "face" for BCM in >>>Governmental organized services in e-Gov SOA. Special interesting is >>>the broader audience in the e-Gov TC and that they need a more >>>governmental and not vendor controlled guidance. >>> >>> >>> >>>One important topic here is the needed "single sign-on" PKI solutions >>>based on a national repository (UDDI?) >>> >>> >>> >>Why do you pre-suppose UDDI here Hans? >> >>Were you aware that UDDI *DOES NOT* provide a repository at all? >> >>I would think that ebXML Registry would be a much better fit for a >>standards-based national registry/repository. It *DOES* provide a >>feature rich repository. >> >>I would be glad to explore this further with the team if needed. Thanks. >> >>-- >>Farrukh >> >> >> >> >>>built upon a _not vendor made_ specification of API Meta-models (Web >>>Services).It is crucial that it must be built upon Governmental terms >>>(as EPR). >>> >>>Such Meta models should be approved by Governments based >>>on recommended certificates from for instance OASIS e-Gov. >>> >>> >>> >>>It would be nice if we could extend our eprXML pilots on a broader >>>international basis! >>> >>>We will also come back on sugestions on international pilots. >>> >>> >>> >>>Best regards >>> >>>Hans A. Aanesen >>> >>>EPR-Forum Norway >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of >> >> >the > > >>OASIS TC), go to >> >> >> >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/egov/members/leave_workgroup.ph > > >>p. >> >>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of >> >> >the OASIS TC), go to >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/egov/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > >> >> > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]