Re: [ekmi] Changes required to submitted document - SKSML

[Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>]

Hi Anil,

  It doesn't look like any comments were received. The TC can go ahead and request a Committee Specification approval ballot; once that's minuted you can fill out the request form here: http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/TCAdminRequests.html. You'll need a comment resolution log noting any/all comments received during any of the reviews and their disposition.

  Once you have everything and submit the request, I can run the ballot.

Regards,

Mary 




On Dec 9, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:

> Mary/Kim,
>  since the public review period is done, what would be the next steps?
> 
> Regards,
> Anil
> 
> On 10/21/2010 03:28 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>> Kim,
>>  I have incorporated the changes and your suggestions.
>> 
>> The zip is here. http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ekmi/download.php/39943/ekmi_spec_1.zip
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Anil
>> 
>> On 10/12/2010 08:02 AM, Kim Goolsby wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> My comments below contain required changes plus suggestions. The suggestions
>>> are just that, suggestions only.
>>> 
>>> Please make the following changes to this document:
>>> 
>>> 1. On the title page, in 'This Version'&  'Previous Version', the underlying
>>> URIs were not updated correctly. Roll the cursor over these links to see the
>>> problem.
>>> 
>>>    - For 'This Version', please change underlying URIs from
>>>    http://docs.oasis-open.org/ekmi/sksml/v1.0/pr02/SKSML-1.0-Specification.xxxto
>>>    http://docs.oasis-open.org/ekmi/sksml/v1.0/pr03/SKSML-1.0-Specification.xxx.
>>>    That is, please change /pr02/ to /pr03/.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    - Similarly, for 'Previous Version', please change underlying URIs from
>>>    http://docs.oasis-open.org/ekmi/sksml/v1.0/pr01/SKSML-1.0-Specification.xxxto
>>>    http://docs.oasis-open.org/ekmi/sksml/v1.0/pr02/SKSML-1.0-Specification.xxx.
>>>    That is, please change /pr01/ to /pr02/.
>>> 
>>> 2. In 'Related Work', the bullet for XML Signature - W3C Recommendation 12
>>> Feb 2002 contains an incorrect date. The document's date is actually 10 June
>>> 2008. I suggest correcting this.
>>> 
>>> 3. Note that clicking on the link in 'Declared XML Namespace(s)' results in
>>> a broken link.
>>> 
>>> 4. In the Status section, the underlying URI contains a misspelling, which
>>> results in a broken link. Please change the spelling of 'committeees' to
>>> 'committees'.
>>> 
>>> 5. The date on the footer is incorrect. Please change from 18 November 2008
>>> to 5 August 2010.
>>> 
>>> 6. Also on the footer, please change the copyright date from 2008 to 2010.
>>> 
>>> 7, Please update the copyright date in the Notices section as well. Change
>>> to 2008-2010.
>>> 
>>> 8. In 'Normative References', the formatting is off. I suggest moving 'http'
>>> back up to the left paren (as is done with the other references in this
>>> section). Note that this was correct in the last version.
>>> 
>>> 9. Also, in 'Normative References', the date for [XML Signauture] is
>>> incorrect. I suggest changing it from 12 Feb 2002 to 10 June 2008.
>>> 
>>> 10. Also in this section, [RFC 2578] contains a broken link. Upon googling
>>> this document I found a number of correct links, one of which was
>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2578.txt. I suggest correcting this broken
>>> link.
>>> 
>>> 11. To conform to the OASIS template, this spec should contain a
>>> Non-Normative References section, even though none are present. Please add
>>> this section followed by N/A to satisfy this requirement.
>>> 
>>> 12. Please add the appendices to the Table of Contents.
>>> 
>>> 13. Lastly, the line numbering is off beginning with [AES] in the Normative
>>> References' section. Please correct. This was correct in the previous
>>> version of this spec.
>>> 
>>> Please contact me with any questions or comments.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Kim