[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [election-services] Defining a trusted voting process - one disabilities concern
Paul, I concur here - its important to get the next iteration of EML 4.0 on the books, and if that itself is "stable" eg wording and editing completed - no issues with it as it stands - then it should go out. However - doing that also is a great opportunity to announce what you are working on next for EML 4.5, which then means adopters can see what is available today to work with - and what the next pieces will be - and we can get input on both levels. DW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Spencer" <paul.spencer@boynings.co.uk> To: <sibain@tendotzero.com> Cc: "eml" <election-services@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 3:59 AM Subject: RE: [election-services] Defining a trusted voting process - one disabilities concern > Simon, > > The basic point is that people are currently implementing EML, and won't do > so if the specification is changing continually. So it is more that we > should consider changes as part of an improvement cycle over some specified > time period. If David is looking at defining and agreeing an electoral > process, that will take some time (perhaps 6-12 months within OASIS, but > considerably longer to get any nation to agree to adopt it) and EML could > then be adjusted to fit. > > At least, that is my understanding and opinion. Perhaps John Borras has a > different view. > > Regards > > Paul > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Simon Bain [mailto:sibain@tendotzero.com] > > Sent: 20 February 2005 07:57 > > To: Paul Spencer > > Cc: "David Webber " <david@drrw.info>, > > election-services@lists.oasis-open.org"@tendotzero.com > > Subject: RE: [election-services] Defining a trusted voting process - one > > disabilities concern > > > > > > Paul hi. > > > > What do you mean by "stability". > > Do you mean that you do not want any updates to the EML spec or do you > > mean that you mean that any future updates should be pllaced on hold for a > > given period of time? > > > > All the best > > Simon > > -- > > Simon Bain > > TENdotZERO > > ---------- > > Tel: 0845 056 3377 > > 44 1234 359090 > > Mobile: 44 (0)7793 769 846 > > > > <quote who="Paul Spencer"> > > > v4 has been released. We are looking for some stability at the > > moment, but > > > that does not mean that we don't want to continue to move forwards. John > > > Borras chairs the TC, and this would be a subject for the meeting he is > > > suggesting. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Paul > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: David Webber (XML) [mailto:david@drrw.info] > > >> Sent: 19 February 2005 16:31 > > >> To: Paul Spencer; election-services@lists.oasis-open.org > > >> Subject: Re: [election-services] Defining a trusted voting > > process - one > > >> disabilities concern > > >> > > >> > > >> Paul, > > >> > > >> Just reviewed the EML docs and schemas and sent some public comments > > >> to the OASIS comments list. Some of this can be addressed now - but > > >> other matters are going to need more work. Are we on a timetable to > > >> release EML 4.0 here - or do we have another release cycle here > > >> to use up? Otherwise a 4.5 release to catch these other matters > > >> clearly is another option. > > >> > > >> Thanks, DW > > >> > > >> > David, > > >> > > > >> > Have you read the EML documents? This is a start on a viable process. > > >> At > > >> the > > >> > time, we felt we needed a reference process to help us define > > >> the schemas. > > >> > We also felt that this process would vary a lot > > >> internationally. However, > > >> > there are certain key points (mainly to do with trust) that can be > > >> > standardised on an international basis. > > >> > > > >> > I would love to see the OASIS E&VSTC get involved in this, but > > >> I wonder if > > >> > OASIS is the right place for this. On the other hand, it could > > >> be the only > > >> > place that would take a truly international (rather than > > >> US-centric) view. > > >> > Also, from a personal view, having spent a considerable time helping > > >> get > > >> EML > > >> > to the stage it is, I would like any new initiative to use it. > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the > > >> roster of the OASIS TC), go to > > >> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/election-services/mem > > > bers/leave_workgroup.php. > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of > > > the OASIS TC), go to > > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/election-services/members/leave > _workgroup.php. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/election-services/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]