[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Updated Trusted Logic Voting with EML 4.0
Team, Received some input from one of the IEEE P1622 team members today - refinements and clarifications - especially around details of the US vote process. I re-posted the materials - http://drrw.net/backup/Trusted-Logic-Voting-Systems-with-EML40.pdf and http://drrw.net/backup/Trusted%20Logic%20Voting%20with%20OASIS%20EML%204.ppt accordingly. Also - references to their work: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/scc38/1622/p1622_documents.htm and this paper - which I think gives excellent level of details that could find its way into a future revision of EML: http://gnosis.cx/publish/voting/privacy-electronic-voting.pdf Two nits with the PDF would be - I'd prefer to keep clear of stipulating any kind of hardware or setup requirements; yes - I expect trusted logic voting to work with off-the-shelf gear - but would not want to exclude other options. And I like what they've done with ballot-ID - the only caveat I have there - is I prefer some kind of simple scheme that the voter can grok - to prevent hidden encoding compromising a ballot in some way. e.g. a code system like AAA-BB-2152354 where each segment of the code has a known purpose and is better than something like: A45gWE67KhjDD23 Other than that - everything else looks in alignment. I like the term "EBI" electronic ballot imaging - excellent. Let me know what else you find with the latest draft? Enjoy, DW
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]