OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

election-services message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Fw: The Case for EML

Thanks for the comments and I have no problems with any of them.  Unless others have any other comments I'm happy to agree this version on the conference call next week. 
The questions about including a reference to IEEE and Schematron can be picked up on the call.
M. +44 (0)7976 157745

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Paul Spencer <paul.spencer@boynings.co.uk>
To: John Borras <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, 23 January, 2007 11:20:50 AM
Subject: The Case for EML


I attach the document with suggested revisions in the text. I used "track
changes", so you should be able to see them easily.

This looks a really good document now. I very much liked the overview,
especially its emphasis on trust.

Most of my changes are editorial. In particular, I have tried to firm up
points that have some text such as "and many others" and "it is recognised
that" that made things look a bit woolly.

Should we mention IEEE P1622?

Schematron is now an ISO standard. Perhaps we should change the reference
for EML v5. One for the conference call.


Paul Spencer
Boynings Consulting Ltd

All New Yahoo! Mail Tired of unwanted email come-ons? Let our SpamGuard protect you.

Case for EML-pds comments.doc

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]