Re: [election-services] EML v6.0 - PUBLIC REVIEW COMMENTS

[Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joehall@berkeley.edu>]

I think it's all reasonably straightforward, other than the comments
on auditing-related information from Neal McB... that is of high
interest in the US where we are actively studying manual-tally
auditing methods and have found that getting election results in a
format that we can use for computations is very difficult.

I still think Neal's last comment, that having toy or example
implementations and more documentation is essential for getting use
here in the US.

best, Joe

On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 6:12 AM, John Borras <John@pensive.eu> wrote:
> To kick this off can I ask for you initial high-level views/comments on
> any/all of the suggested changes by 15 January please.



-- 
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
ACCURATE Postdoctoral Research Associate
UC Berkeley School of Information
Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
http://josephhall.org/