Re: [election-services] A use case for the p1622 group:p1622-audit-01: Post-election tabulation auditing

[David Webber <david.webber@oracle.com>]

Neal,

This is very helpful.  Quick thought is that the EML 440 vote count can be easily used here for audit count detail capture - recording the hand audit determinations - essentially the process is a re-vote.

Then the 510 and particularly the 530 would be the formats for the reporting of results to public for statistical determinations.

DW

----- Original Message -----
From: nealmcb@gmail.com
To: election-services@lists.oasis-open.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:56:53 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [election-services] A use case for the p1622 group: p1622-audit-01: Post-election tabulation auditing

The IEEE P1622 group has a meeting scheduled today, and I've sent in
(and attached here) a "use case" for the flow of auditing data from
local jurisdictions to state-wide audit coordinators and back and
forth.  (I find deadlines so very helpful :)

 Use case p1622-audit-01: Post-election tabulation auditing

It is described in general terms since that group hasn't yet committed
to EML, but I've tried to incorporate the helpful feedback I've gotten
from here also.

Comments would be highly appreciated!

Neal McBurnett                 http://neal.mcburnett.org/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php