RE: [election-services] Reviewing EML against needs for UOCAVA

["Zelechoski, Peter" <pzelechoski@essvote.com>]

Title: Reviewing EML against needs for UOCAVA

John –

 

It took me a few extra days but I finally got through reviewing the prior P1622 needs against the v6 of EML.  I have attached that analysis.

 

- Peter

 

From: John Borras [mailto:johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: 2011-03-07 2:33 AM
To: 'EML TC'
Subject: RE: [election-services] Reviewing EML against needs for UOCAVA

 

Hi All

 

Is anyone in a position to help Peter please?   If we don’t have an answer is this something to fix in v7?

 

John

 

From: Zelechoski, Peter [mailto:pzelechoski@essvote.com]
Sent: 03 March 2011 16:16
To: EML TC
Subject: [election-services] Reviewing EML against needs for UOCAVA

 

I have been reviewing the previous IEEE work (not done yet, but still hope to be done tomorrow as promised).  I know the 330 voter list has elements to allow specification of the ballot forms a voter is entitled to.  BUT – not all Voter Registration systems know the ballot forms; some only know the polling station grouping a voter is associated with.

As a consequence, I am looking for a message that supports the need to communicate the ballot forms that go with a given polling station grouping.  Can anyone give me a nudge?

- Peter

ReviewOfPriorDraftIdentifiedEmlNeeds20110309.pdf