[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency-msg] EM TC Notifications, Methods and Messaging 09-16-03 Meeting Minutes
At 12:35 PM -0400 9/20/03, R. Allen Wyke wrote: >If they can't resolve a URI, how do they plan on validating the message >against a schema? Just speculating... but I imagine they could validate against a local cached schema... or even use a non-validating parser and handle any resulting data errors downstream in the application. We aren't always talking about what we normally think of as "computers" here... many CAP consumers will be embedded "thin" devices. Anyway, any consumer on a one-way link will have a problem with retrieving updates. My understanding is that that's precisely why the warning-systems industry is interested in a standard... because once they start deploying firmware in commercial quantities it won't be feasible for them to chase a moving-target schema. Certainly we're addressing a broader user community here than in some other OASIS projects. Still, supporting use of CAP over one-way channels has been one of our explicit requirements since the beginning. What I'm hearing here is feedback from users who care about that particular use case and aren't persuaded that we've met that requirement. - Art
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]