OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emergency message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [emergency] CAP and Signatures/Encryption

You're right... but since the question has arisen I'm thinking it 
might not hurt to be explicit that the MUST NOT clause only 
constrains the interior of the CAP message and not the transport 

- Art

At 11:58 AM -0500 1/25/05, Bob Wyman wrote:
>Art Botterell wrote:
>>  How about if we changed the last line to read "Other XML
>>  encryption mechanisms MUST NOT be used within CAP Alert Messages,
>>  although other forms of encryption MAY be applied in the transmission
>>  of CAP messages."?
>	The wording you propose would do no harm, however, it would be more
>traditional for a format specification to remain silent on the issue of
>transport layer mechanisms.
>		bob wyman

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]