RE: [emergency] RE: Structure

["David Danko" <DDanko@esri.com>]

I disagree with the GeoPolitical Information System SC just being listed
under the EDXL work. GeoStuff affects sensors, CAP, EDXL, etc.

I also think it shouldn't be named "GeoPolitical" (we should stay away
from politics and religion :-)

I agree targeting of messages is one thing that should be addressed, but
also the geo information content of messages as well. We are not just
concerned with political areas but other geographic designations as
well, geometric areas (horizontal, vertical, etc), geographic features,
the whole range of geo types.

Dave

David M. Danko
GIS Standards
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
8620 Westwood Center Drive
Vienna, VA 22182-2214
USA
E-mail: ddanko@esri.com
Tel: 703-506-9515 x 8011
Mobile: 703-989-1863
Fax: 703-506 9514

-----Original Message-----
From: michellearaymond@gmail.com [mailto:michellearaymond@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 12:14 PM
To: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [emergency] RE: Structure

Here's my take on potential sub-com structures

Emergency Management

Sub-Committees
       Messaging and Notification
               (communication with people)

               CAP


       Systems and Sensors
               (workflow and system communication)


       Metrics and Analysis
               (operational analysis)


       Distribution and Infrastructure
               (protocol and architecture)

               EDXL

       Geopolitical Information System
               (targeting of messages)

Task Forces
                Use Cases
                Demonstrations / Presentations

- Michelle Raymond