Re: [emergency] Fwd: OASIS EM TC Category for EDXL standards

[Elysa Jones <ejones@warningsystems.com>]

Renato,  This is a good suggestion and one I agree we should do.  I will 
put this on the agenda for the next full TC meeting Oct 4.  Don't know how 
to get you involved with the time difference.  Maybe you could stawman a 
"kplan" and toss it out for review before or as a part of the call?  Other 
ideas?
Elysa

At 09:23 PM 9/19/2005, Renato Iannella wrote:


>On 19 Sep 2005, at 20:44, Elysa Jones wrote:
>
>>>For some time now our workplan has been to continue to promote and
>>>develop CAP separately while EDXL develops and mature, and then to
>>>create a fully EDXL-compliant version at CAP 2.0.
>
>Perhaps we (this TC) needs to discuss and document our own kplan.
>Then we can tell the outside world what to "expect" from the TC.
>
>It would be good for the outside stake holders to know, for example,
>that CAP 2.0 may be dependent on EDXL 1.5.
>
>Cheers...  Renato Iannella
>National ICT Australia (NICTA)
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally
>privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
>use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
>recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
>messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
>data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
>amendment. This notice should not be removed.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
>at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>