[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: Suggestion: Add incidentKeyword to contentObject
Forwarding message from Mark Carlson…
Patti Iles Aymond, PhD Innovative Emergency Management, Inc. Managing Risk in a Complex World 8555 United Plaza Blvd. Suite 100 From: Mark Carlson -
Conneva, Inc. [mailto:conneva@gmail.com]
Patti,
I tried sending this message to the group, but the list server rejected my message. Could you forward, please?
Mark =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
I'm quite sure everyone is hoping for no more changes to the EDXL-DE schema at this point. However, as I have begun to work with the schema in our resourcing prototype, I have observed that while there are incidentID and incidentDescription elements in the contentObject, there is no provision to classify the incident using a valueListURN/value pair.
This would seem to be necessary for consistency. In other words, if it is a good idea to have an incidentDescription and incidentID in the contentObject, there should also be an optional incidentKeyword to classify the incident.
Regards,
Mark Carlson
IEM CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PLEASE READ OUR NOTICE: |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]