[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] EDXL-DE Committee Draft
All, Do I correctly recall that our next TC meeting won't be conducted until March 9? If so, I recommend we lay out our cards now in case anyone feels the option to pull back and re-publish is warranted. My input is that this is simply a typo that can be corrected after this 15-day review. However, if others feel the error truly is substantive, I feel we should pull it back, make the correction, and republish ASAP rather than incurring an additional 15-day public comment. Regards, Tim Grapes Evolution Technologies, Inc. Disaster Management egov Initiative Science and Technology Directorate/OIC Department of Homeland Security Office: (703) 654-6075 Mobile: (703) 304-4829 tgrapes@evotecinc.com tim.grapes@associates.dhs.gov -----Original Message----- From: Elysa Jones [mailto:ejones@warningsystems.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 1:06 PM To: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [emergency] EDXL-DE Committee Draft TC Members, As discussed on our call yesterday, there are a couple of issues with the EDXL-DE that have been brought to light from within the TC. We are not able to make any changes to the posted documents until after the 15 day review. That review is schedule to end March 4. The only comments so far have come from within the TC although I fully expect some comments as the end draws near. The most significant comment is the problem with the schema not matching the DOM. The DOM is correct and the place most folks look for understanding of what is presented. I have discussed our situation with Mary McRae, our OASIS staff contact to determine our most efficient method to proceed. She said that if in the mind of the TC, the schema would be considered non-normative, it could be changed as any other typo or correction that is non-substantive after the 15-day review is complete. If we do feel that the correction of the schema is substantive, another 15-day comment period would be required. In that case, we could pull the current 15-day review, make the change and re-publish. Or we could wait until this period is over, make our corrections and re-post for another 15-day review. In either case, the document has to go to OASIS by the 15th of the month prior to the month of the vote. With a successful 15-day review in this round, we will be able to submit to OASIS by the 15th of March and thus an OASIS wide vote the last 2 weeks of April. A second 15-day review no matter how it happens will postpone the OASIS wide vote until the last 2 weeks of May. That is where we stand now and there is no real need for a decision at this point. Please consider whether you feel the incorrect schema is substantive or not and let me know the will of the TC as to how we proceed. Regards, Elysa Jones Chair, OASIS EM-TC Engineering PRogram Manager Warning Systems, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.0.0/266 - Release Date: 2/21/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.0.0/266 - Release Date: 2/21/2006
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]