RE: [emergency] About "borrowing" elements from edxl specs.

["Joerg, Werner" <Werner.Joerg@iem.com>]

I like that improvement: it definitely helps with clarity – Thanks!

 

From: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:emergency@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Mancuso
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:33
To: Joerg, Werner
Cc: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [emergency] About "borrowing" elements from edxl specs.

 

Made some minor tweaks to the proposed Note:

 

Note: only messages that fully comply with the EDXL-TEP specification may be referred to as a “TEP Message.” In particular, individual elements borrowed from the specification or non-compliant message wrappers around such elements shall not be referred to as a “TEP Message.”

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Werner Joerg <Werner.Joerg@iem.com> wrote:

"Note: only messages that fully comply with the EDXL-TEP specification may be referred to as “TEP Message”. In particular no individual elements borrowed from the specification or non-compliant message wrappers around such elements may be called “TEP Message”."