[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emix] Documents and SGIP
1) I cannot change the existing document per the [new] process.
2) I cannot in good conscience chnage a document comming up for a vote in less than 24 hours
3) The existing package of schemas and examples included the WS-Calendar WD19 (which now should be Pr02 - grrr - that's why *that* vote happened last week]
4) We cannot help what people may or may not imagine
5) I cannot guarantee that OASIS will publish linkable references to the hope-to-be-voted-for-PR in any time frame relevant to this conversation.
I respectfully suggest we decline your suggestion. I propose changing nothing-unless the TC directs me otherwise. Doing so, of course, prevents voting any sort of public documents before SGIP.
tc
From: William Cox [wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 1:58 PM To: emix@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [emix] Documents and SGIP I would suggest that the WS-Calendar schemas be marked "informative" so there's no confusion that EMIX is defining them. This could be an annotation in the schemas or simply in the namespace document.
Not sure how to do with "no change" but you seem to be contemplating replacing those with the PR02 WS-Calendar schemas. Thanks! bill -- William Cox
Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax On 3/23/11 12:21 PM, Toby Considine wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]