[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (EMIX-518) Process needed tomaintain alignment between SEP 2 and OASIS EMIX
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EMIX-518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=27076#action_27076 ] William Cox commented on EMIX-518: ---------------------------------- The comments address methods of work and management of the Technical Committee's work. As such, it is not in scope for comments on a Work Product and Committee Specification Draft. The issues have been brought to the attention of the Technical Committee. Close; no action possible. > Process needed to maintain alignment between SEP 2 and OASIS EMIX > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: EMIX-518 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EMIX-518 > Project: OASIS Energy Market Information Exchange (eMIX) TC > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: CSD03/PR03 > Environment: Marty Burns PR03 Comments > Reporter: William Cox > Assignee: William Cox > > See http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/emix-comment/201108/msg00000.html ; text copied below. > Subject: FW: [PAP09] Process needed to maintain alignment between SEP 2 and OASIS EMIX > From: "Marty Burns" <burnsmarty@aol.com> > To: <emix-comment@lists.oasis-open.org> > Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:38:04 -0400 > All, > The forwarded email comes from Don Sturek as a result of the presentations > in the SGIP PAP030409 review session held yesterday. It illustrates some of > the concerns with the current draft that should be addressed prior to > completion of the standard. > Those of us who have worked long and hard to support this effort with our > in-depth analysis, review, and comments would like to see the ultimate > result have a strong interoperability path with SEP 2.0. > Cheers, > Marty > -----Original Message----- > From: SGIP PAP09 Working Group [mailto:SGIP-PAP09WG@SMARTGRIDLISTSERV.ORG] > On Behalf Of Don Sturek > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:33 PM > To: SGIP-PAP09WG@SMARTGRIDLISTSERV.ORG > Subject: [PAP09] Process needed to maintain alignment between SEP 2 and > OASIS EMIX > On today's PAP 3, 4 and 9 call, I brought up a concern around alignment > between the OASIS EMIX work and ZigBee SEP 2.0. This alignment is also > needed in the OpenADR.org group. > Here is some background: > 1) PAP 10 aligned the seed standard from ZigBee SEP 2.0 with the EIS > Alliance (since folded into ASHRAE SPC201) plus aligned the data from the > OASIS EMIX work (at the time) > 2) There was a PAP 3, 4, 9 alignment meeting between OASIS, OpenADR and > ZigBee SEP 2 last December where some useful differences were noted and > folded into OASIS EMIX comments. > 3) The OASIS EMIX work is close to completion and will be the starting > point for the OpenADR.org work. > 4) Likewise, ZigBee SEP 2 is out for public comment which closes on Sunday. > 5) The gameplan in ZigBee SEP 2 is still to donate the UML model back to > IEC 61968 for consideration (and as a standards repository) > Here are the artifacts we have to work with on this alignment: > 1) ZigBee SEP 2 started with the iEC 61968 model and extended it for PEV, > DER and DR use cases. This model was aligned with the SGIP through the PAP > 10 process. > 2) ZigBee SEP 2 uses XSDs derived from the model above as its normative > reference. The model is *not* normative but used to derive these XSDs > 3) OASIS EMIX uses a data model and has reverse engineered a UML model. I > was not clear on whether this was analyzed with the PAP 10 work for > alignment or not. > My main concern with the above process is how to keep the underlying object > models aligned so that smart grid implementers (whether in the utility back > office or in a translation box in a premise) can clearly map between the SEP > 2 and OASIS EMIX standards. Right now, I am not 100% sure this is possible > and going forward I think we all agreed some process is needed to ensure > this alignment. > So my request in this note is two fold: > 1) Go through one last alignment review of SEP 2 and OASIS EMIX to be sure > these standards, when launched, have a clear mapping. > 2) Absent a reference-able UML model that both can use to facilitate a > mapping, we need a procedure to ensure that future revisions of OASIS EMIX > and SEP 2 remain in alignment from a data model point of view. > Don -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]