OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emix message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (EMIX-518) Process needed tomaintain alignment between SEP 2 and OASIS EMIX



     [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EMIX-518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

William Cox updated EMIX-518:
-----------------------------

    Resolution: Close, no action--not in scope of Public Review 03.

> Process needed to maintain alignment between SEP 2 and OASIS EMIX
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: EMIX-518
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EMIX-518
>             Project: OASIS Energy Market Information Exchange (eMIX) TC
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: CSD03/PR03
>         Environment: Marty Burns PR03 Comments
>            Reporter: William Cox
>            Assignee: William Cox
>
> See http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/emix-comment/201108/msg00000.html ; text copied below.
> Subject: FW: [PAP09] Process needed to maintain alignment between SEP 2 and OASIS EMIX
>     From: "Marty Burns" <burnsmarty@aol.com>
>     To: <emix-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
>     Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:38:04 -0400
> All,
> The forwarded email comes from Don Sturek as a result of the presentations
> in the SGIP PAP030409 review session held yesterday. It illustrates some of
> the concerns with the current draft that should be addressed prior to
> completion of the standard.
> Those of us who have worked long and hard to support this effort with our
> in-depth analysis, review, and comments would like to see the ultimate
> result have a strong interoperability path with SEP 2.0.
> Cheers,
> Marty
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SGIP PAP09 Working Group [mailto:SGIP-PAP09WG@SMARTGRIDLISTSERV.ORG]
> On Behalf Of Don Sturek
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:33 PM
> To: SGIP-PAP09WG@SMARTGRIDLISTSERV.ORG
> Subject: [PAP09] Process needed to maintain alignment between SEP 2 and
> OASIS EMIX
> On today's PAP 3, 4 and 9 call, I brought up a concern around alignment
> between the OASIS EMIX work and ZigBee SEP 2.0.  This alignment is also
> needed in the OpenADR.org group.
> Here is some background:
> 1)  PAP 10 aligned the seed standard from ZigBee SEP 2.0 with the EIS
> Alliance (since folded into ASHRAE SPC201) plus aligned the data from the
> OASIS EMIX work (at the time)
> 2)  There was a PAP 3, 4, 9 alignment meeting between OASIS, OpenADR and
> ZigBee SEP 2 last December where some useful differences were noted and
> folded into OASIS EMIX comments.
> 3)  The OASIS EMIX work is close to completion and will be the starting
> point for the OpenADR.org work.   
> 4)  Likewise, ZigBee SEP 2 is out for public comment which closes on Sunday.
> 5)  The gameplan in ZigBee SEP 2 is still to donate the UML model back to
> IEC 61968 for consideration (and as a standards repository)
> Here are the artifacts we have to work with on this alignment:
> 1)  ZigBee SEP 2 started with the iEC 61968 model and extended it for PEV,
> DER and DR use cases.  This model was aligned with the SGIP through the PAP
> 10 process.
> 2)  ZigBee SEP 2 uses XSDs derived from the model above as its normative
> reference.  The model is *not* normative but used to derive these XSDs
> 3)  OASIS EMIX uses a data model and has reverse engineered a UML model.   I
> was not clear on whether this was analyzed with the PAP 10 work for
> alignment or not.
> My main concern with the above process is how to keep the underlying object
> models aligned so that smart grid implementers (whether in the utility back
> office or in a translation box in a premise) can clearly map between the SEP
> 2 and OASIS EMIX standards.  Right now, I am not 100% sure this is possible
> and going forward I think we all agreed some process is needed to ensure
> this alignment.
> So my request in this note is two fold:
> 1)  Go through one last alignment review of SEP 2 and OASIS EMIX to be sure
> these standards, when launched, have a clear mapping.
> 2)  Absent a reference-able UML model that both can use to facilitate a
> mapping, we need a procedure to ensure that future revisions of OASIS EMIX
> and SEP 2 remain in alignment from a data model point of view.
> Don

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]