[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emix] Source and Content
Source of electricity is generally not specific plants but categories such as wind, solar, coal, nuclear, hydro, natural gas sources of electricity. Source certification can take the form of “green certificates” which would be an example of a source warrant. A buyer of electricity would want to know if ownership such certificates are conveyed by a product or are stripped off. A source warrant can make this clear. Otherwise a source warrant may be provided by operators of generators for example. I cannot find any use of “electricity content” but there may be a use. Edward G. Cazalet, Ph.D. 101 First Street, Suite 552 Los Altos, CA 94022 650-949-5274 cell: 408-621-2772 From: William Cox [mailto:wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com] Hmm. I was going to say drop the source warrant... William Cox
I recommend we can drop the Content Warrant. Edward G. Cazalet, Ph.D. 101 First Street, Suite 552 Los Altos, CA 94022 650-949-5274 cell: 408-621-2772 From: Toby Considine [mailto:tobyconsidine@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Toby Considine The current specification has both Source and Content Warrants. I have been unable to find any definition that distinguishes between these two, and on the CPUC site, they appear to be identical. Any suggestions? The choices are (1) Find a distinguishing definition (2) Delete one or the other. “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.”
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]