Re: [energyinterop] Section Four proposal

[William Cox <wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com>]

Doug --

This is a good approach. I'm including much of it in the next working draft.

We'll be working on the NAESB content in (I think) the next working draft, and we will concentrate on the individual services.

Thanks!

bill
--

William Cox
Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
+1 862 485 3696 mobile
+1 908 277 3460 fax

On 5/12/2010 2:57 PM, Walker, Doug wrote:

66078B1BCF3E054A8349606249950069035183BE@FEVSP02.oa.caiso.com" type="cite">

Here is a quick draft to give some ideas of a rework of section 4.  I tried to make it in line with discussions today regarding ‘Party’.  I did not have the original graphics, so I had to create new ones, but the main point was to put forth the idea that Actor is a role that a particular entity can play.  This will potentially change for each atomic service interaction. 

 

Also, are we using the NAESB work for context of individual services?  If so, that should be added to the NAESB section (currently placeholder) and we can concentrate on the individual services.

 

As this is a radical change, I wanted to get it out early to see if this was along the lines of the group’s thoughts.

 

Thank you,
Douglas Walker
916.351.2371

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php