[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Catalog Requirements (resend after 2-day bounce)
/ John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> was heard to say: | Norman Walsh wrote: | > 3. I think it will open the door to the question of how many different [...] | I do think that if we are introducing general URI-URI rewriting, we do | have to go here, although the syntax URI NAMESPACE "uri" "uri" might be | better. (I think generalized 9401 parsers can parse that even if | they don't understand it, right?) Well, in fact we're doing this in XML, so it'll probably be something like <uri type="namespace" uri="xxx" soi="yyy"/> I'm just using 9401 ASCII syntax in mail because it's more terse (terser?). And no, I'm not seriously proposing those attribute names :-) | Of course, we could dispense with this by not doing generalized | URI-URI rewriting, but only rewriting system ids and public ids. | Maybe not as universal, but easier to delimit. That's what I'm thinking. I'm not sure it's enough, though. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@East.Sun.COM | A man can believe a considerable deal of XML Technology Center | rubbish, and yet go about his daily work in Sun Microsystems, Inc. | a rational and cheerful manner.--Norman | Douglas
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC