[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: first proposal
on 12/04/2000, Paul Grasso wrote; >I know the DOM uses mixed case, and so does Java. But they are >programming languages. We're talking about a catalog that a user >needs to be able to create and modify, and many catalog users will >not be programmers. I submit that the markup language developers are often programmers, or at least used to operating in a work environment that is oriented towards program and website development. I think that speaking with a programmer-oriented syntax and lexicon is what they expect. In my experience, the non-developers, like authors, would not get into the rules-oriented portions of the markup, and because of that, would not be involved in editing the catalogue or dtd/schema. I suggest that the lowerCase or UpperCase CamelSyntax would be fine, as best harmonises with the rest of the forward looking (not deprecated, etc.) standards for markup rules and usage. Regards, David Leland Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com> on 12/04/2000 09:19:32 AM To: entity-resolution@lists.oasis-open.org cc: (bcc: David Leland/LONDON/FINANCIAL TIMES) Subject: Re: first proposal At 17:27 2000 12 03 -0800, Lauren Wood wrote: >On 3 Dec 2000, Tony Coates wrote: >> On 29/11/2000 14:11:23 Norman Walsh wrote: >> >Matter of taste, I guess. That means we have four choices: >> > >> >1. All UPPERCASE, as per 9401 >> >2. All lowercase >> >3. camelCase like XML Schema, Java identifiers, etc. >> >4. CamelCase like the SGML DocBook DTD (though only because case >> > didn't matter) >> >> Sorry to do this, but I would like to suggest #5: >> >> 5. UpperCamelCase for elements, lowerCamelCase for attributes. >> >> Privately, the touch-typist in me prefers lower-case-with-hyphens > >Which would be proposal number 6? If we're figuring out which of 1- >5, why not 1-6? > >The main reason I don't like all lower, or all upper, is that the words >run together. Almost anything that solves that problem gets my vote. Mixed case is going to cause problems for users. Mixing mixed case (sometimes UpperCamelCase sometimes lowerCamelCase) is even more confusing. I know the DOM uses mixed case, and so does Java. But they are programming languages. We're talking about a catalog that a user needs to be able to create and modify, and many catalog users will not be programmers. Given both Tony's and Lauren's comment, I would vote for lower-case-with-hyphens. paul ********************************************************************* * Please visit the web site of the Financial Times at: * * http://www.ft.com * * * * For UK personal finance, please visit http://www.ftyourmoney.com * * * * This E-Mail is intended for the use of the addressee only and may * * contain confidential information. If you are not the intended * * recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination * * of this communication is strictly prohibited. * * If you receive this transmission in error, please notify us * * immediately then delete this E-Mail. * * * * * postmaster@ft.com * *********************************************************************
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC