[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [entity-resolution] Mixing XML Catalog and TR9401
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / "Lauren Wood" <lauren@textuality.com> was heard to say: | Daniel Veillard tried sending this to the comments mailing list; I've | deleted the email problem parts and hereby raising the issue to the | ER TC. Hopefully the OASIS issues will be fixed soon... | Subject: Mixing XML Catalog and TR9401 | To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Cc: entity-resolution-comments@lists.oasis-open.org | | Got this: | http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109046 | | "It would be nice if <nextCatalog> entries in XML Catalog files | could | point to TR9401 catalogs. | | Issue 23 in http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/entity/issues.html | indicates that support for this is allowed" | | Can you comment on the expected processing ? Is the TR9401 catalog | remapped to an XML catalog internally ? For me the structures are | completely different for both, they really have different | processing model, I find this a curious a-posteriori change to | the specification. We worked really hard to give XML Catalogs the same semantics as TR9401 catalogs. What structures seem different to you? (Aside from the obvious issue of syntax and the addition of the new "uri" elements in XML Catalogs.) I'm pretty confident that I implemented them with exactly the same code base. I have a loader class that transforms either catalog format into an internal representation and that representation is used for processing. Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | Between the ages of twenty and forty we are XML Standards Architect | engaged in the process of discovering who we Web Tech. and Standards | are, which involves learning the difference Sun Microsystems, Inc. | between accidental limitations which it is | our duty to outgrow and the necessary | limitations of our nature beyond which we | cannot trespass with impunity.--W. H. Auden -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE+f0nxOyltUcwYWjsRAv3rAJ96mbOsM/L47tznNhHXWxxaovurjQCeOPS7 Az+3y1CqwafGsUbfWd3DUls= =Lwjb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]