[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [geolang-comment] ISSUE 3: The "language" published subject
It is given that we will create one published subject for each code in the ISO 639 standard. The question is: should we create a "language" published subject? This is an issue because it seems likely that most people will want to assert that these published subjects are instances of a class "language", but unless there is a published subject for this concept these assertions will not merge correctly. (Of course, some people may not want to, but the existence of a "language" published subject will not force them to use it, even if they use the individual code subjects.) So, should we create such a published subject? If we do, how do we define "language"? If we don't, do we just accept that every user of language.xtm will most likely define their own "language" topic? -- Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net > ISO SC34/WG3, OASIS GeoLang TC <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC