RE: HM.VR_AI: Goals and Overview : HumanML_VR_AI Facilitator

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

Title: Re: HM.VR_AI: Goals and Overview : HumanML_VR_AI Facil

It depends on what the scope of human communication is.  Primary and secondary audiences are

a straightforward problem, though.  Each is still a receiver with an identity, location, etc.  There

are the meanings they associate with some given token (signal, sign, symbol) and there are

the potential transformations along the path on that which can alter the intended meaning.   We

don't specify those, but we may need to provide a means by which such can be documented

or modeled.

 

I agree, the customer's requirements for the language must be understood.

 

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]

 

IMHO, we're trying to do something we should not be doing when we get into thinking about specifying primary, let alone secondary, audiences for HumanML. Isn't that the realm of apps builders?