RE: [humanmarkup-comment] Referents

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

That's sorta what I thought.

However, I did want it in the list for looking at again when we 
finish the first pass through the existing schema.

Ciao,
Rex

At 9:01 AM -0500 8/22/02, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>Currently, a referent is a concrete element type
>in the sign element type.  It doesn't have to
>go in the primary.   It is likely that referent
>contents will use types that come from the primary,
>thus the geolocator example.
>
>len
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]
>
>Please add referants to our list of additions for the Primary Base
>Schema, although this sounds like it might end up in the Secondary
>Base Schema if we reserve the primary semiotic terminology, with our
>common-sense-understandable definitions, to the Primary Base Schema.
>However, that is a discussion for another day.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>


-- 
Rex Brooks
Starbourne Communications Design
1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA 94702 *510-849-2309
http://www.starbourne.com * rexb@starbourne.com