[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [humanmarkup] PBS-Voting Version
I Vote to approve. Rex Brooks wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Oops, forgot to attach documents. > > We decided to vote on the first draft of the Primary Base Schema by > Oct. 31, 2002, so here is the final first draft after proofreading > corrections and after an examination of some considerations Sylvia > asked privately, a few minimal changes. Since you have not had a > chance to look at the changes, I will list them. There are only two > and they are very minor > > I have attached a Word version and the ,xsd file and I have uploaded > an html version to our TC website that you can access at this url: > > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/humanmarkup/huml-primary-base-1.0/huml-primary-base-1.0.html > > > I will address Sylvia's concerns in a separate post. Please note that > there is a very important consideration at the end of that post. It is > very important that our invited experts and those who have been given > that status recently read that section. We will have some very > important decisions to make in regard to that. > > I will address more wide-ranging concerns in a third post. > > 1. HumlNameElement changed to HumanNameElement. This was my own > suggestion to relieve any possibility of conflict with our namespace > prefix and the Camel Case Guidelines we are now following. Sylvia also > had a note about this, requesting the same change for a slightly > different reason, but her reason was equally valid. We mean a Human's > Name. However, you should read my answer to her specific question in > the separate post. > > 2. Personality has had Enneagram and Meyers-Briggs removed as > sequenced elements. This was due to a suggestion from Sylvia > requesting other candidates as accepted personality-typing systems, > but rather than go down the path of adding more, I deferred that work > to the Secondary Base Schema. > > *Note: Many of the more developed complexTypes similarly show > examples, and in the foregoing item it was an addition I made, so it > was a subtraction I felt confident in making. A similar case for such > has been in the strawman all along so I did not feel I should remove it. > > Please vote by replying to this email by Oct. 31, 2002. I vote to > approve. > > Ciao, > Rex > -- From the Desk of James E. Landrum III Database Manager Archaeology Technologies Laboratory (ATL; http://atl.ndsu.edu) Digital Archive Network for Anthropology (DANA; http://atl.ndsu.edu/archive) North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58105 Ph: 701-231-7115 (my desk) and ATL 701-231-6434 FAX: 701-231-1047 email: james.landrum@ndsu.nodak.edu
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC