OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

huml message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Fwd: RE: [humanmarkup-comment] Speech and Melody: How DifferentParts of the Brain are Used Dep ending on the Language


Title: Fwd: RE: [humanmarkup-comment] Speech and Melody: How
Hi Folks,

I'm forwarding this to the huml list and to Amir, with this note to Len:

The TC list address is huml@lists.oasis-open.org even though the public comment list is humanmarkup-comment@lists.oasis-open.org.

We asked OASIS to change them both but only one got done during the big transition, and though Ranjeeth has asked that it be changed for the public comment list, it hasn't happened yet, and probably won't, given that it hasn't happened yet.

So much for consistency.

This article yields some fascinating conclusions. Perhaps the most far-reaching is the fact that this pretty much tells us that culture as language-dependent affects brain structure development as well as usage.

Ciao,
Rex

Mailing-List: contact humanmarkup-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org; run by ezmlm
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Post: <mailto:humanmarkup-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
List-Help: <mailto:humanmarkup-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:humanmarkup-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:humanmarkup-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list humanmarkup-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=8.0
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
To: humanmarkup-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:43:21 -0500
Subject: RE: [humanmarkup-comment] Speech and Melody:  How Different Parts
      of the Brain are Used Dep ending on the Language
X-Rcpt-To: <rexb@starbourne.com>
X-DPOP: Version number supressed
Status: U
6.  What greater competencies does the requirements for melodic control and
processing require that can affect miscommunication and are these classifiable
into contextual categories?  For example, a skilled English speaker can succeed
based on clarity of the voice, such as the competence of a news broadcaster,
without understanding the text.  On the other hand, interpretation and composition
require text understanding.  
 
Are there domains that are harder to express in mandarin?
Is the language modified such as relaxation of the melodic requirements to
make it easier to understand conceptually complex utterances?  For example,
we sing popular songs, musicals, and so on, but we simplify the texts and
we tend to rely on indexical forms, etc., to get greater meaning and still make
the melody/timing palatable? 
 
How much are the contemporary and historical
sets of signs in fashion (eg, argot, popular phrases) affected by the melodic
component?  Could we tell from such styles when and where a concept
originated ? (Think of pottery analysis.)  Do these simplifications affect the
complexity of artifacts, acts, etc., the culture is capable of?  Is this also
domain dependent (eg, do melodic language cultures exhibit competence
and lack of competence depending on the tasks, for example, animal
husbandry vs road or bridge engineering?)
 
len
-----Original Message-----
From: Bullard, Claude L (Len)
http://www.cnn.com/2003/HEALTH/06/30/brain.language.reut/index.html
This story is a fascinating tidbit relating the parts of the brain used to process
speech and the dependency on the artifacts of the particular language, in this
case, Mandarin.  One could ask some questions:
 
1.  How does such a language evolve given the greater resource requirements
for processing the language?
 
2.  Do any unique capabilities emerge as a result of this extra use of both
hemispheres of the brain?  For example, parallel capabilities such as easy
of musical training?
 
3. Do musicians, particularly singers, rate higher than the average westerner
when learning Mandarin?  Does learning Mandarin increase one's musical skills?
 
4. While it is stated that English-speakers have greater difficulty learning
Mandarin, are there miscommunications that emerge more often when
an English speaker and a Mandarin speaker interact that could be attributed
to this difference in the way the brain processes the language?
 
5.  Would any capabilities of HumanML help with these problems of communication
beyond noting the fact of the melodic dependencies of the presentation of the
Mandain sign sets?  Are some sign sets more or less melodically dependent?
 
Fascinating stuff.  Beyond us here, but the sorts of problems one might conceivably
bring to HumanML.  For example, representation of the vocal utterance given a
library based on Rex's work is certainly possible. 
 
len


-- 
Rex Brooks
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
Email: rexb@starbourne.com
Tel: 510-849-2309
Fax: By Request


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]