[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fwd: RE: [humanmarkup-comment] Speech and Melody: How DifferentParts of the Brain are Used Dep ending on the Language
Mailing-List: contact humanmarkup-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org; run by ezmlm
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Post: <mailto:humanmarkup-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
List-Help: <mailto:humanmarkup-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:humanmarkup-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:humanmarkup-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list humanmarkup-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=8.0
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
To: humanmarkup-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:43:21 -0500
Subject: RE: [humanmarkup-comment] Speech and Melody: How Different Parts
of the Brain are Used Dep ending on the Language
X-Rcpt-To: <rexb@starbourne.com>
X-DPOP: Version number supressed
Status: U
6. What greater competencies does the requirements for melodic control and
processing require that can affect miscommunication and are these classifiable
into contextual categories? For example, a skilled English speaker can succeed
based on clarity of the voice, such as the competence of a news broadcaster,
without understanding the text. On the other hand, interpretation and composition
require text understanding.
Are there domains that are harder to express in mandarin?
Is the language modified such as relaxation of the melodic requirements to
make it easier to understand conceptually complex utterances? For example,
we sing popular songs, musicals, and so on, but we simplify the texts and
we tend to rely on indexical forms, etc., to get greater meaning and still make
the melody/timing palatable?
How much are the contemporary and historical
sets of signs in fashion (eg, argot, popular phrases) affected by the melodic
component? Could we tell from such styles when and where a concept
originated ? (Think of pottery analysis.) Do these simplifications affect the
complexity of artifacts, acts, etc., the culture is capable of? Is this also
domain dependent (eg, do melodic language cultures exhibit competence
and lack of competence depending on the tasks, for example, animal
husbandry vs road or bridge engineering?)
len
-----Original Message-----
From: Bullard, Claude L (Len)
http://www.cnn.com/2003/HEALTH/06/30/brain.language.reut/index.html
This story is a fascinating tidbit relating the parts of the brain used to processspeech and the dependency on the artifacts of the particular language, in thiscase, Mandarin. One could ask some questions:1. How does such a language evolve given the greater resource requirementsfor processing the language?2. Do any unique capabilities emerge as a result of this extra use of bothhemispheres of the brain? For example, parallel capabilities such as easyof musical training?3. Do musicians, particularly singers, rate higher than the average westernerwhen learning Mandarin? Does learning Mandarin increase one's musical skills?4. While it is stated that English-speakers have greater difficulty learningMandarin, are there miscommunications that emerge more often whenan English speaker and a Mandarin speaker interact that could be attributedto this difference in the way the brain processes the language?5. Would any capabilities of HumanML help with these problems of communicationbeyond noting the fact of the melodic dependencies of the presentation of theMandain sign sets? Are some sign sets more or less melodically dependent?Fascinating stuff. Beyond us here, but the sorts of problems one might conceivablybring to HumanML. For example, representation of the vocal utterance given alibrary based on Rex's work is certainly possible.len
--
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]