Re: [id-cloud] Two ballots opened -- action required

[Rainer Hoerbe <rainer@hoerbe.at>]

Hi,

Herbert mentioning the STORK SAML profile reminded me of an issue with SAML in the gap document. While OpenID is specified in detail, SAML is just referenced at large. Use cases pertain to different SAML standards, e.g. some use cases might reference SAML Metadata for scalable configuration of nodes.

I would like to raise this topic into the Kantara eGov WG, but the discussion cycle would probably not return any results before the end of the year. Is it still useful to work on that topic?

Best regards

Rainer

Am 18.11.2013 um 22:16 schrieb Gershon Janssen <gershon@qroot.com>:

Hi all,

Last Monday the ID-Cloud TC had a teleconference meeting.

We decided to go forward and

* GAP Analysis document:

- apply discussed modification to the GAP Analysis V1 Working Draft 4 document. For a diff version against CND01 see https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=51446&wg_abbrev=id-cloud

- setup a 7-day ballot requesting the TC members for (1) approval for designating Working Draft 4 as a Committee Note Draft and (2) approval  for releasing it for a second 15-day Public Review.

BALLOT can be found at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/id-cloud/ballot.php?id=2543

* Cloud PaaS Profile

As the second 15-day Public Review closed at the end October 2013 without comments received, we like to move to approve it as a Committee Note, so:

- setup a 7-day ballot requesting the TC members to approve the Cloud PaaS Profile V1.0 Committee Note Draft as a Committee Note.

BALLOT can be found at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/id-cloud/ballot.php?id=2542

We like to ask our voting members to cast their votes to these ballots.

Kind regards,

Gershon Janssen