[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [idtrust-ms] Groups - IDtrust-MS-SC-Minutes-2008-11-05(2008-11-05-IDtrust-MS-SCMinutes.doc) uploaded
Just for clarification, are we now abandoning creating new claim URI values by concatenating combinations of verification types like: http://schemas.informationcard.net/@ics/verification-method/email-verification-email+in-person-proofing/2008-12 Or is that still the plan without the + ? I am not opposed to a space separated list of URI as the value of verification-method/2008-12 I think that is preferable to minting a large number of URI for the value to represent every possible combination. =jbradley On 17-Dec-08, at 4:11 PM, dee.schur@oasis-open.org wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]