RE: [imi] Updated SAML 1.1 token profile document

["Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

Mike Jones wrote on 2009-10-14:
> The attached doc incorporates the results of our investigation -
> recommending that SAML 1.1 tokens use URL-valued claim names and that if
> non-URL-valued claim names are used, that the SAML 2.0 token profile be
> used instead.

Mike, the NIH wiki topic reference should be replaced with this one:

http://middleware.internet2.edu/dir/docs/internet2-mace-dir-saml-attributes-
200804.pdf

That's the comprehensive profile for attribute usage that you're alluding to
in the proposal.

-- Scott