kmip message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [kmip] Groups - Proposal for modification to Conformance Section (Conformance_Clause_Proposal_V3.doc) uploaded
- From: Bruce Rich <brich@us.ibm.com>
- To: Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:20:56 -0500
Mary,
Thanks for the clarification. In
doing a quick re-read of our charter, it seems that it is quiet on the
topic of profiles, so it's unclear whether this is expanding the scope
of work or not. Minimally. profile governance work may extend the
anticipated time commitments of some of the TC members.
Bruce A Rich
brich at-sign us dot ibm dot com
From:
| Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
|
To:
| Bruce Rich/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
|
Cc:
| walt.hubis@lsi.com, kmip@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Date:
| 07/16/2009 11:25 AM
|
Subject:
| Re: [kmip] Groups - Proposal for modification
to Conformance Section (Conformance_Clause_Proposal_V3.doc) uploaded |
Hi Bruce,
That's not quite true. A TC doesn't cease its work
until it has either agreed to dissolve or until it finishes the work items
described in the Charter. Most TCs continue to update that list of work
items as time processes and further refinements/enhancements/additions/modifications/etc
are deemed appropriate. The only thing a TC cannot do is expand its scope
of work. Most TCs produce multiple iterations of a spec (v1.0, v1.1, v.1.2,
v2.0), profiles, and other ancillary works in support of the specs themselves.
Regards,
Mary
Mary P McRae
Director, Standards Development
Technical Committee Administrator
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
web: www.oasis-open.org
twitter: fiberartisan #oasisopen
phone: 1.603.232.9090
Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're
open.
On Jul 16, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Bruce Rich wrote:
Overall, I like the proposal.
However, I think one key provision that will be problematic with this proposal
is Section 13.3.
In general, there are no standing committees at OASIS. Once a standard
is completed, the TCs cease their work. So I'm not sure how one would
get a profile approved when the TC has dissolved. And since this
seems to be the engine that drives this mechanism, I'm not sure where that
leaves us.
Bruce A Rich
brich at-sign us dot ibm dot com
This is revision 3 of the Proposal for Modification of the Conformance
section of the Specification and the Usage Guide.
-- Mr. Walt Hubis
The document revision named Proposal for modification to Conformance
Section (Conformance_Clause_Proposal_V3.doc) has been submitted by Mr.
Walt
Hubis to the OASIS Key Management Interoperability Protocol (KMIP) TC
document repository. This document is revision #2 of
Conformance_Clause_Proposal.doc.
Document Description:
Includes several proposals on modifications and movement of the conformance
section and a "simple" to use table of requirements for
claiming
conformance.
View Document Details:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=33327
Download Document:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/33327/Conformance_Clause_Proposal_V3.doc
Revision:
This document is revision #2 of Conformance_Clause_Proposal.doc. The
document details page referenced above will show the complete revision
history.
PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email application
may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy
and paste
the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.
-OASIS Open Administration
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]