Re: [kmip] Groups - kmip-spec-v1.1-csprd01-attribute-index-update-summary.pdf uploaded

[Bruce Rich <brich@us.ibm.com>]

Minor quibble.  Rather than saying
"is assumed", can we strengthen this to "SHALL be assumed"?
 Lines 1443 (addAttribute) and 1452-3 (deleteAttribute).

Bruce A Rich
brich at-sign us dot ibm dot com




From:      
 Tim Hudson <tjh@cryptsoft.com>
To:      
 kmip@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:      
 04/04/2012 09:40 PM
Subject:    
   [kmip] Groups
- kmip-spec-v1.1-csprd01-attribute-index-update-summary.pdf uploaded
Sent by:    
   <kmip@lists.oasis-open.org>

---

Submitter's message
Proposal to revert the attribute index change in KMIP 1.1 as discussed
at the face-to-face and in the last TC meeting. 
-- Tim Hudson

Document Name: kmip-spec-v1.1-csprd01-attribute-index-update-summary.pdf

---

Description
Proposal to revert the Attribute Index handling back to the previous
approach (where an Attribute Index not being specified means the Attribute
Index is assumed to be 0 in all contexts).

The changes are from the review version of 1.1 only reverting the items
related to requiring attribute index to always be specified and defining an
index of -1 to have special meaning.

The error conditions for Modify and Delete were also fixed to match the
descriptions (the older descriptions were incorrect for KMIP 1.1).
Download Latest Revision
Public Download Link

---

Submitter: Tim Hudson
Group: OASIS Key Management Interoperability Protocol (KMIP) TC
Folder: Proposals
Date submitted: 2012-04-04 19:40:30