Re: [kmip] KMIP 2.1 test case CS-BC-M-13-21

[Tim Hudson <tjh@cryptsoft.com>]

Thanks for pointing that out. The fixed values were left over from the test case it was copied from.

With the RandomIV=true those items are indeed inherently variable.

I've adjusted that in my set of test cases and will include that change in the next working draft upload version.

Thanks,

Tim.

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:09 AM Martin Shannon <ms@quintessencelabs.com> wrote:

The response to Step 1 has hardcoded values for Data & IVCounterNonce. I believe they should be parameterized as $DATA_0 & $IV_COUNTER_NONCE

Â

Martin

Â

Â

ÂMartin ShannonÂ| Software DeveloperÂ| QuintessenceLabs | W: quintessencelabs.comÂ	Â
ÂUnit 1 Lower Ground |15 Denison St | Deakin ACT 2600 | P: +61 2 6260 4922 Â	Â
 ÂWorld Economic Forum Technology Pioneer	Â
ÂFind out more atÂquintessencelabs.com	Â
ÂÂÂ

Â