Re: [legalruleml] definition of Association

[Guido Governatori <Guido.Governatori@nicta.com.au>]

Tara, thanks for the effort.

The definition is not very clear to me. I would go for the meaning (a set set of triples) ignoring the implementation aspects (i.e., that we use two sets of pairs). Also the set of triples does not says too much on what we use Association for.

In my view the glossary should give definitions explaining the intuition of the terms (we have the schematic for the specifications of how we build our structures)

I think that "a set of typed relationships between non target entities and a target entity".

Mathematically this is represented as. {R1,..., Rn}, where each Ri is  of type  Entity x Entity, namely each Ri is a set of ordered pairs.

Thus, if we want to be more explicit, we can add "...' where each the type of a relationship describe the nature of how a non target entity is associated with a target entity."

I'm not particularly happy with "associated with" (suggestions are welcome).

All the best

Guido

Sent from my iPad

> On 8 Jan 2014, at 17:34, Tara Athan <taraathan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> An attempt:
>
> Association: a set of triples (Subject Relation Target) having a representation in the form of two sets, a set of pairs (Subject Relation) and a set of targets, where the set of triples is formed from all possible combinations of one member of the set of pairs and a second member of the set of targets.
>
> Tara
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

________________________________

The information in this e-mail may be confidential and subject to legal professional privilege and/or copyright. National ICT Australia Limited accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments.