Re: [legalruleml] Glossary Document revision

[Guido Governatori <Guido.Governatori@nicta.com.au>]

On 8 Mar 2014, at 9:43 am, Tara Athan <taraathan@gmail.com> wrote:

> Attached are some minor changes to the Glossary document.
>
> I have transferred all of these Node definitions into the schema and committed.
>
> There is just one mismatch - we have no definition for the Overrides element, and a definition of OverridesStatement that probably should refer to an Overrides. Like so:
>
> Overrides +: an indication of a defeasible priority relationship between Legal Rules.
> OverridesStatement +: a statement of an Overrides.
> This definition would read better if it was Override ( a noun) rather than Overrides ( a verb).
> Tara
>

An alternative definition of Overrides could be: "an indication that a Legal Rules takes precedence over a second Legal Rule. The two Legal Rules are in a defeasible priority relationship".

All the best

Guido

> <Glossary-v9-corr.odt><ATT00001.txt>


________________________________

The information in this e-mail may be confidential and subject to legal professional privilege and/or copyright. National ICT Australia Limited accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments.