Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:19
AM
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Revised
Standard for Specification Testing
All:
Attached is a proposed revised standard for
specification testing. For those who were not able to participate in the
face-to-face discussion at the TC meeting in Salt Lake City, the purpose of
this document is to define the process for establishing test
criteria for all Electronic Court Filing
Technical Committee Specifications (for example, Court Filing
1.1). This
establishes the definition for our TC of "successfully using" a committee specification,
which is something that three member
organizations must certify for those committee specifications that we choose
to submit to OASIS for consideration as an OASIS standard. We also propose to use this same process for the purpose
of moving a standard to "Recommended" status, for presentation to the Joint Technology
Committee.
The co-chairs would like to
present our standard for specification testing
to the Joint Technology Committee meeting on July 21st. This gives us a short
turnaround for comment on this proposed
standard (I apologize for not getting this out sooner). I believe that all feedback and discussion from the
face-to-face meeting in Salt Lake City has been incorporated into this
document. Following the process proposed
for approval of minutes by the TC, I suggest TC members have one week from the
posting of this document (i.e. until July
16th)
to comment or provide feedback. If no
feedback is received, the document will be deemed approved as our standard for
specification testing. If feedback is received, it will be incorporated into the document on July 17th. If this does
not allow enough time to present to the Joint Technology Committee meeting on
July 21st, an alternate timeline can be established.
We may want to consider whether this
document should move to the Certification Subcommittee for any future enhancements
after this initial version. It seems as
if this would be a logical part of that subcommittee's scope.
Note that once the TC has agreed on this
revised standard, the Court Filing interoperability testing definition needs
to be revised accordingly. The attendees
at the Salt Lake City meeting felt it was important to first establish the
base-line process for all TC specifications, and then review and revise the Court Filing testing
definition per our standardized process.
Catherine
Krause
E-Filing Project Manager
King County Department of Judicial
Administration
(206)296-7860
catherine.krause@metrokc.gov
<<Testing
Recommendations, v2.doc>>