legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Revised Standard for Specification Tes ting
- From: "Winters, Roger" <Roger.Winters@METROKC.GOV>
- To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:11:29 -0700
Title: Revised Standard for Specification Testing
Catherine,
and all other colleagues in the Court Filing TC,
As you
and I, Catherine, have discussed, here
are my few suggestions for the Specification Testing
recommendations.
In 2), I
recommend removing the word "ideally." I think we need to make testing criteria
a part of any Requirements document. As TC Editor, I would make
sure it is part of our template for Requirements documents. Should a work
product not be appropriate for testing, that would be explained. "Ideally" gives
us too much wiggle room to skip doing this step.
In 4), I
would remove "as determined by the TC/Subcommittee developing the Requirements"
and substitute "as described in the specification." This would make testing
criteria a required part of any specification which, since it has to be approved
by the TC, would mean the TC as a whole agrees on those criteria for
each specification, not just the drafting group.
In 6) a), I
would change "should" to "must," and we will work to have a template for testing
reports.
In 7), I
would add a third statement, following an "and/or" at the end of b): "c)
When it has met other criteria approved for it by the TC." Even if a) and b)
cover most of what we can imagine today would be relevant to this point, we
should expect there will be specifications where other criteria need to be
applied.
In 8), I
recommend removing the word "Interoperability" because we would want all special
terms to be defined explicitly in any kind of testing documents. It would, of
course, be up to the drafters to realize what "special terms" they are using
that need definition. However, in the review process, it would be
appropriate for anyone giving input to ask for definition of any terms.
I hope these
comments help strengthen this good piece of work.
Regards,
Roger
Roger
Winters
Electronic Court
Records Manager
King County
Department of Judicial Administration
MS: KCC-JA-0609
516
Third Ave., E-609
Seattle,
Washington 98104-2386
V: (206)
296-7838 F: (206) 296-0906
Roger.Winters@metrokc.gov
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC