RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Results of SF face to face meeting 2-22-06

[John Messing <jmessing@law-on-line.com>]

Thanks for the clarification. Best regards.



> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Results of SF face to face meeting
> 2-22-06
> From: "Smith, Christopher" <Christopher.Smith@jud.ca.gov>
> Date: Thu, February 23, 2006 9:34 am
> To: "John Messing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com>, <john@greacen.net>,
> <legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Cc: "Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee"
> <legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org>
> 
> John:
> 
> I am probably stepping out of my realm of expertise here, but as I
> understand it our state's Department of Child Support Services is one of
> the biggest filers in our courts.  It is also a controlled group because
> all child support must go through this agency rather than from the
> father directly.  And, therefore, any time there is a change in child
> support, a jurisdictional change, or other amendment that requires a
> findings and orders, it must be submitted to a trial court. These
> parents may primarily be served by US mail now, but I suggested that it
> might be interesting to find out if some Child Support Services groups
> are doing much primary (or personal) service. 
> 
> Having said that, I also asked the National Center to find out if there
> is any agency or state interested in pursuing electronic primary
> service.  If there is no potential customer at this time, this issue
> should probably be pushed back to a later edition while we gain some
> implementation experience.   
> 
> 
> Christopher Smith
> Senior Business Systems Analyst
> Information Services Division
> Judicial Council of California - Administrative Office of the Courts
> 455 Golden Gate Avenue
> San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
> 415-865-7416, Fax 415-865-7497, christopher.smith@jud.ca.gov
> www.courtinfo.ca.gov <http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov>
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Messing [mailto:jmessing@law-on-line.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 8:25 AM
> To: john@greacen.net; legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
> Cc: Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee
> Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Results of SF face to face meeting
> 2-22-06
> 
> From the results document:
> 
> "Christopher Smith recommended including child support cases as a
> potential for primary electronic service because non-custodial parents
> are required to register with the state child support agency."   
> 
> Aren't the child support agencies a category of administrative law
> bodies rather than judicial entities? Should this topic be deferred
> together with other administrative law agency actions until later in the
> ECF 3.x adoption process?
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php