[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: ECF required elements
ECF TC: Here is some input from the federal bankruptcy courts for our discussion on required and optional elements in ECF. Jim Cabral Helping our clients make a difference in the lives of the people they serve. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. From: Speetjens, Joseph T (US SSA) [mailto:joe.speetjens@baesystems.com] James, Thank you for the opportunity to comment. The ones I’ve highlighted below are data elements that I do not typically have access to for our noticing purposes. I would not deem them required.
We are currently in the process of integrating the XML generator into the rest of our system. Delays have had more to do with how to we prep the data for the XML so that it is consistent from a couple of different source than anything else. We should have some data in about a month that I would like to run by you if I may. Joe -----Original Message----- Joe, The ECF TC is currently revisiting the list of required and optional elements in the ECF 4.01 specification. I remember that you had some questions about required elements in the BankruptcyCaseType and possibly other types as well. Could you review the ECF-constraints.html file and let me know which elements highlighted in red you believe should be optional? Thanks, Jim Cabral MTG Management Consultants, L.L.C. (206) 442-5010 Phone (502) 509-4532 Mobile Helping our clients make a difference in the lives of the people they serve. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. -----Original Message----- From: James E Cabral Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 1:52 PM To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: ECF required elements ECF TC: During the public review of the ECF 4.01 Core specification, LA County commented that we may be requiring some elements that should be optional. At the last TC call, I agreed to provide to the TC a list of all required elements in ECF for review by the TC. Please find that list attached for your review and comment. BTW, in putting together that list, I noticed that the latest versions of the ECF 4.01 specifications, including the version the public review draft, did not have all the constraints applied to the NIEM subset. I have attached an updated version of the public review draft with the constraints applied as before with the following minor changes to enable the instance provided in the specification to validate: 1. nc:PersonName is no longer required in nc:Person 2. nc:ContactMeans may occur multiple times in nc:ContractInformationType 3. nc:AddressDeliveryPoint may occur multiple times in nc:StructuredAddressType. 4. j:ArrestCharge is optional but may occur multiple times in j:ArrestType Thanks, James E. Cabral Jr., Senior Manager MTG Management Consultants, L.L.C. 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3010 Seattle, Washington 98101-3292 (206) 442-5010 Phone (502) 509-4532 Mobile (206) 442-5011 Fax Helping our clients make a difference in the lives of the people they serve. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]