Re: Fw: [legalxml-courtfiling] RE: Limited Electronic Service of Process

Subject: Re: Fw: [legalxml-courtfiling] RE: Limited Electronic Service of Process Proposal

Sure, happy to do so Jim.

Dallas, the header was put there to meet a requirement from the TC Process that was added when the concept of the Non-Standards Track work product (aka Committee Note as opposed to a Committee Specification) was first created. Committee Notes are, by definition, not normative. In the TC Process, the Non-Standards Track Work Product definition explains that they are " intended to be informative and explanatory in nature. They are not subject to the patent licensing and non-assertion obligations requirements of the OASIS IPR Policy."

In another section, the Process requires that the disclaimer be on every page. Personally I think it is overkill but it is what we have to do.

Note though that the disclaimer is only for the patent protection coverage - because there is nothing in the document to implement so no patent protection is required. The copyright in the work is held by OASIS.

Let me know if this answers the question.

/chet

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:52 PM, James E Cabral <jec@mtgmc.com> wrote:

Chet,

Could you please respond to Dallas’ question about the IPR rules around Committee Notes and other Non-standards track documents?

__
Jim Cabral
502 509-4532

From: Jim Price
Sent: ‎Friday‎, ‎July‎ ‎10‎, ‎2015 ‎2‎:‎42‎ ‎PM
To: Dallas Powell, legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org

Excellent question, Dallas. I’m deferring to the Committee Chairs on this one. We used the template as requested and didn’t spend time diving into the templates finer details.

Thank you,

Jim

From: Dallas Powell [mailto:dpowell@tybera.com]
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 11:33 AM
To: Price, Jim; legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: Limited Electronic Service of Process Proposal

I looked at this document and I some comments but first a question. The header says “The patent provisions of the OASIS IPR Policy do not apply.” Is this the way it is supposed to be. I thought anything distributed within this committee falls under the OASIS IRP. And if not, who owns the IP for this document?

Dallas

From: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Price, Jim
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 11:28 AM
To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Limited Electronic Service of Process Proposal

TC,

The attached contains the Limited Electronic Service of Process (eSOP) proposal for your consideration. Special thanks to George Knecht for his contributions in developing the proposal.

Jim Price

/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org

Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393

legalxml-courtfiling message