Re: [legalxml-enotary] Re: Draft minutes of the First Meeting

[eric.e.cohen@us.pwcglobal.com]

To supplement the draft minutes, we also stated that we would try to bring together a list of

Organizations with works that overlap digital signatures and documents or other related topics, such as W3 XML Signature and related topics (XML Canonicalization, et al) and XKMS; OASIS WS Security and related issues; MISMO's implementation of signatures

Organizations that are already in the business of providing overlapping/related (proprietary) solutions, such as www.eoriginal.com, www.surety.com and others

Organizations that may be interested in the work, such as the one I represent, XBRL.org

and asked those who could identify potential participants to send those entries to you/(John).

<eccn />

Eric E. Cohen
Chair, XBRL US

John Messing <jmessing@law-on-line.com> 10/07/2002 10:54 PM

To:        legalxml-enotary@lists.oasis-open.org         cc:                 Subject:        [legalxml-enotary] Re: Draft minutes of the First Meeting

Our draft minutes state:
Unanimous consensus emerged for the rapid development of several illustrative narrative scenarios dealing with authentication 
needs for further discussion, which could include evidentiary considerations, though it was agreed that the work of the TC 
was much broader than just evidentiary rules for electronic documents in court cases.
 
Pieter, RAM, Rolly, Roger, Dr. Leff, Dan, John agreed to begin a discussion on the list of various scenarios to which the TC 
could contribute as a committee of the whole.
 
...
 
The next telephonic meeting will be held on Oct. 17 @ 1 PM EDT.
 
I am afraid I have been remiss in this exercise, and I see that I am not alone. Could we make a concerted effort in the next few days to generate five such illustrative scenarios. They need not be from lawyers or technically accurate, just illustrative of a potential direction for the group. I will generate two by day after tomorrow.
 
I have been informed by VeriSign that a separate TC will be formed for CALEA issues, so that discussion now appears to be moot as far as this group is concerned, unless someone has an opinion to the contrary.
 
Thanks and best regards to all.



_________________________________________________________________
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or 
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or 
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material 
from any computer.