RE: [legalxml-intjustice] Groups - GJXDM Relationships Requirements Memo 2005 07 (xstf-relationships-final.doc) uploaded

[John Messing <jmessing@law-on-line.com>]

Isn't RDF better suited to these relationships?

> --'------ Original Message --------
> Subject: [legalxml-intjustice] Groups - GJXDM Relationships
> Requirements Memo 2005 07   (xstf-relationships-final.doc) uploaded
> From: eperry@mtgmc.com
> Date: Wed, October 05, 2005 8:26 pm
> To: legalxml-intjustice@lists.oasis-open.org
> 
> This is an important "foundation" document for the ongoing XSTF work
> regarding relationship (association) modeling as well as upcoming work to
> better define roles.
> 
> I haven't included comments or the following GTRI document as this
> information is a "moving target."  Updated documents will be posted as soon
> as they are available.
> 
>  -- Ms Ellen Perry
> 
> The document named GJXDM Relationships Requirements Memo 2005 07
> (xstf-relationships-final.doc) has been submitted by Ms Ellen Perry to the
> OASIS LegalXML Integrated Justice TC document repository.
> 
> Document Description:
> This document was the result of a "tiger team" effort (chair: Scott Edson,
> members: Scott Came, Winfield Wagner, Joe Mierwa) that focused on defining
> the requirements for improving the way relationships are rendered in GJXDM.
> 
> View Document Details:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/legalxml-intjustice/document.php?document_id=14780
> 
> Download Document:  
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/legalxml-intjustice/download.php/14780/xstf-relationships-final.doc
> 
> 
> PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email application
> may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able to copy and paste
> the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.
> 
> -OASIS Open Administration