RE: [obix] Conversation on oBIX obix OBIX moving to list (UNCLASSIFIED)

["Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com>]

This is the only real conflict we have...

http://www.obix.com/

tc
-----Original Message-----
From: Bogen, Chris ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS [mailto:Chris.Bogen@erdc.dren.mil] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 12:15 PM
To: Toby Considine; obix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [obix] Conversation on oBIX obix OBIX moving to list
(UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO

I see no harm in keeping 'oBIX' because it shouldn't confuse folks that are
using obix.  

-----Original Message-----
From: obix@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:obix@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf
Of Toby Considine
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 10:47 AM
To: obix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [obix] Conversation on oBIX obix OBIX moving to list

 

From: Gemmill, Craig [mailto:craig.gemmill@tridium.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 10:53 AM
To: Toby Considine; Markus Jung
Subject: RE: Any document updates?

 

I don't really care, I've been trying to use 'oBIX' because I thought that's
what the standard was, but people that are not on the TC tend to be sloppy
about the way they type it, plus our Java-based naming conventions lead to
common phrases like "the ObixNetwork in a Niagara station communicates using
the oBIX protocol".  So the waters are already thoroughly muddied w.r.t.
case.  Most people just type 'obix' or 'OBIX', and don't bother to get the
case correct.  While I like the oBIX, maybe it's better to just pick what
people are already using?

 


Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO