[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ocpp] Regarding the current advisory ballot
Hi James, I have a sight difficulty voting for Yes or No because a) I definitely want the standardization of that backend protocol to move forward as quickly as possible (thus a tenendy to vote for Yes) b) I hate the idea that a company is claiming patent rights on some of the specification of that newly created standard (thus a tendency to vote No) So a) is more important to me than b), which is why I voted for Yes, but what is the alternative if we close the TC under Non-Assertion mode and no RAND mode TC is being reopened? Has that been discussed? I don’t really remember from our last OASIS OCPP TC call last week. Best, Dr.-Ing. Marc Mültin V2G Clarity Mobil: +49 170 8668645 Expertenwissen und Blog zur E-Mobilität sowie dem Vehicle-2-Grid Kommunikationsstandard ISO 15118 unter:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]