Suggestion for grouping motion on ODATA-8(1,2,3)

[Stefan Drees <stefan@drees.name>]

Dear Ralf,

in the upcoming meeting I would like to
1.
move that the ODATA-Issues with numbers 81, 82 and 83 are approved as 
proposed.
Would you second this :?)
May I even go further and ask, if there are other issues with "small 
and/or merely editorial impact, and proposed resolutions which are ready 
to implement" that we might add to the above list ?

2.
Are there (in addition to ODATA-85) issues that might just "jump right 
into "accepted as open, proposed and closed as applied"-state?

@all:
Any comments or suggestions upon other grouped acceptance perspectives? 
With regard to the impact of single issue processing on 
processing/meeting time (approx. independant of the issue's 
granularity!) there might be some candidates for "bunching", at least 
when I read the list of the 36 Issues queued in "New and Proposed State" 
... IMO a discussion grouping might also be a performance boost, since 
"our attention" is better supported, then with permanent context-switch 
from issue to issue. So if there is a better sequence in processing than 
the number ordering ... please suggest it.

All the best,
Stefan.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift