[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [odf-adoption] Interop camp example
Don, thanks for the info. I'll pass it on to the organizers. Cheers, Charles. donald_harbison@us.ibm.com a écrit : > > Charles: > > IBM - 4 > Sun - 4 > Google - 2 > KOffice - 2 > Red Hat - 1 > Novell - 4 > SEPT Soltns - 1 > Gravity - 1 > __ > 19 > > In all likelihood it could be as many as 25 - 30 once we get the word > out and do more recruiting. In other words we need a classroom with > wifi and video projection, maybe breakout room(s). > > > /don > > > Don Harbison > Program Director, IBM ODF Initiative > Business & Technical Strategy > IBM Software Group > tel:1-978-399-7018 > Mobile: +1-978-761-0116 > email: donald_harbison@us.ibm.com > > > > > From: "Charles-H. Schulz" <charles-h.schulz@arsaperta.com> > To: "odf-adoption@lists.oasis-open.or" > <odf-adoption@lists.oasis-open.org> > Date: 06/27/2007 06:31 PM > Subject: Re: [odf-adoption] Interop camp example > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Hello Erwin, all, > > how many people do you think would attend this event? > > best, > Charles. > > > > donald_harbison@us.ibm.com a écrit : > > > > Erwin, > > > > I like your outline below., I recommend we propose this for > > discussion/review/modification to the conference organizers for > > consideration under the September 18th 'Project' day programme. That > > way it removes any confusion/conflict with the mainstream conference. > > > > Comments? > > > > Regards, > > > > Don Harbison > > Program Director, IBM ODF Initiative > > Business & Technical Strategy > > IBM Software Group > > tel:1-978-399-7018 > > Mobile: +1-978-761-0116 > > email: donald_harbison@us.ibm.com > > > > > > > > > > From: Erwin Tenhumberg <Erwin.Tenhumberg@Sun.COM> > > To: robert_weir@us.ibm.com > > Cc: odf-adoption@lists.oasis-open.org > > Date: 06/26/2007 04:42 AM > > Subject: Re: [odf-adoption] Interop camp example > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > Hi Rob, > > > > Thanks a lot for your input and your ideas! > > > > I'd like to step back for a second and think about the larger agenda > > of the event first. Here is what I could imagine: > > > > > > 1) Keynote by an ODF adopter about what they expect regarding > > interoperability / conformance (30 minutes) > > > > 2) Potentially a second 30 minute keynote by another ODF adopter > > (30 minutes) > > > > 3) 10 minute presentations by the different ODF implementors who > > came to the event about how much of ODF they implemented, > > how they did it and what major problems they ran into > > (about 1 hour and 30 minutes) > > > > 4) Lunch (1 hour) > > > > 5) Workshop / discussion / brainstorming / life testing of the > > issues mentioned during the first presentations (3 hours) > > > > 6) A session for anybody interested in implementing ODF and > > wants to learn from the experts how to do it, e.g. it could > > be a panel where the newbies ask the experts. (1 hour) > > > > > > Focusing on word processing might make sense because it might be > > the area where we can achieve a critical mass most easily. > > However, we could also first just ask the different companies and > > projects who will come and then decide if we want to add other > > aspects as well. For example, if Google and KOffice send > > spreadsheet guys, we could add spreadsheets to the agenda. > > > > > > Max Odendahl from Odendahl SEPT-Solutions who created Mobile > > Office from Symbian already expressed interest in coming to the > > event. I haven't heard back from Softmaker, yet. > > > > > > I guess topics 1) to 5) would be useful for any vendor interested > > in implementing ODF, but I think we should encourage them to > > be remain in a "listening only" / consuming mode for the first > > parts in order not to distract the interop discussions. Then in > > session 6) all the newbies would get a chance to ask all the > > questions they collected during the day. Invitations could be > > sent to CMS, DMS, SOA, etc. vendors. > > > > > > Anyway, in the end the key players for ths workshop are the > > experts specifying ODF and implementing ODF. Thus, it might > > make sense to move this discussion to the main line TC or > > at least to include the main line TC. > > > > I myself like to attend the event and am willing to help with the > > setup, but I probably would not be a key player at the event myself. > > > > > > All the best, > > Erwin > > > > > > > > robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote: > > > > > > A few words to explain what I was proposing for an interoperability > > camp. > > > > > > I was thinking we could concentrate on word processor format > > > interoperability, since we're more likely to get a critical mass of > > > participants if we focus. The idea would be to get those who knew the > > > internals of their word process and came with the source code and the > > > ability to prototype changes during the camp. So we want the coders. > > > > > > In advance of the camp, we would send out PDF files illustrating some > > > sample documents. In advance of the camp, each vendor would > attempt to > > > replicate that document to the best of their application's abilities. > > > They would then save the document in ODF format. > > > > > > An example document might be to replicate the first page of this PDF: > > > > > > https://www.socialsecurity.be/foreign/en/employer_limosa/infos/documents/pdf/act_mb_28122006.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > This is an example of Belgian statute format, where the text is > > given in > > > parallel translation. To get the proper alignment would require > > > probably the use of tables with hidden borders. There are also some > > > challenging aspects of getting the numbered lists and list levels > > correct . > > > > > > When we send out the PDF we would also provide some annotations to > > > explain some finer points of the document that might otherwise be > > > overlooked, like the use of em-dahes and en-dashes in the page header. > > > > > > Depending on the complexity, we might have 5 or so documents that > we do > > > in this way, each one emphasizing different practical issues > concerning > > > interoperability. > > > > > > We would collect the ODF's from each vendor in advance of the > camp, and > > > distribute them to everyone at the camp, or a few days in advance. So > > > if we have 5 vendors, then everyone would have 5 different ODF > versions > > > of each document. > > > > > > And what do we do at the camp? Say we have 5 vendors and 5 target > > > documents. That gives each vendor 20 documents to try loading, giving > > > 100 different interoperability tests we can perform. How do we handle > > > this? One way would be to set aside an hour for each document and > have > > > each vendor take a turn first explaining any issues they had in > > creating > > > the document originally, and then they could load each other vendor's > > > version of that document, and the group could note what new > > problems, if > > > any, show up. If each vendor can be projecting their application on > > the > > > screen while doing this, we can all look and observe together, and do > > > this efficiently. > > > > > > We would then want to reserve some time for coding, and some time at > > the > > > end for vendors to demonstrate any fixes, and some time to discuss > next > > > steps. > > > > > > As you can see, this is going to be time consuming. So maybe we would > > > only be able to do 2-3 test documents? > > > > > > -Rob > > > ___________________________ > > > > > > Rob Weir > > > Software Architect > > > Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software > > > IBM Software Group > > > > > > email: robert_weir@us.ibm.com > > > phone: 1-978-399-7122 > > > blog: http://www.robweir.com/blog/ > > > > > > > -- > Charles-H. Schulz, > Associé / Associate > Ars Aperta. > > -- Charles-H. Schulz, Associé / Associate Ars Aperta.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]