Re: [office-accessibility] Proposal. mediaObject element.

[Nathaniel S Borenstein <nborenst@us.ibm.com>]

One question:

"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
wrote on 03/03/2006 04:01:32 AM:

> <define name="med-mediaobject">
>   <element name="med:mediaObject">
>     <oneOrMore>
>       <ref name="med-imageobject"/>
>       <ref name="med-textobject"/>
>       <ref name="med-audioobject"/>
>       <ref name="med-videoobject"/>
>     </oneOrMore>
>   </element>
> </define>

Is there an implication here that there is a preferred
order of viewing, e.g. that one should use the video object preferentially
when the user can handle multiple of the "oneOrMore" objects?
 That's how it works for multipart/alternative in MIME, but that decision
was made for reasons that are completely irrelevant here; I just thought
we ought to think about specifying how implementations are advised to choose
from among the alternatives presented.  -- Nathaniel